From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May  2 18:24:55 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77EF616A402;
	Wed,  2 May 2007 18:24:55 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pjd@garage.freebsd.pl)
Received: from mail.garage.freebsd.pl (arm132.internetdsl.tpnet.pl
	[83.17.198.132])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D78F13C447;
	Wed,  2 May 2007 18:24:55 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pjd@garage.freebsd.pl)
Received: by mail.garage.freebsd.pl (Postfix, from userid 65534)
	id 579A848A2A; Wed,  2 May 2007 20:24:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (cvl74.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [83.19.93.74])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.garage.freebsd.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9DF45B26;
	Wed,  2 May 2007 20:24:45 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 20:24:18 +0200
From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
Message-ID: <20070502182418.GB1997@garage.freebsd.pl>
References: <200705021453.20372.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de>
	<f1a3r8$2gg$1@sea.gmane.org> <46389DED.5060509@freebsd.org>
	<200705021631.02167.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de>
	<f1a8bn$l9m$1@sea.gmane.org> <4638BE34.3070709@freebsd.org>
	<4638C2D5.2040907@fer.hr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gj572EiMnwbLXET9"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4638C2D5.2040907@fer.hr>
X-PGP-Key-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/pjd.asc
X-OS: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT i386
User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on 
	mail.garage.freebsd.pl
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL 
	autolearn=no version=3.0.4
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: gjournal + gmirror question
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 18:24:55 -0000


--gj572EiMnwbLXET9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 06:56:53PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Eric Anderson wrote:
>=20
> > Well, there would be less of a point to using gjournaling if you still
> > had to fsck the whole thing, right?  With gjournaling, you can just run
> > an 'fsck -p' on it, which takes less than 1 second on my 10Tb fs.  So,
> > no need to benchmark.
>=20
> I understand that, but is "fsck -p" the default when gjournal is active
> on the file system? I don't have any active gjournal file systems so I
> don't know.

When you call 'fsck -p' on gjournaled file system, it recognize that it
is journaled and only garbage-collects orphaned inodes.

--=20
Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.wheel.pl
pjd@FreeBSD.org                           http://www.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer                         Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!

--gj572EiMnwbLXET9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFGONdSForvXbEpPzQRAks/AKCO+5+FNY9/yJmmm8cqgqBfLh4hxACg8Pcv
7xY7vNNI4xpXMG8QEgx7hZA=
=lT5k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gj572EiMnwbLXET9--