From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Feb 21 15:43:07 1996 Return-Path: owner-chat Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA10369 for chat-outgoing; Wed, 21 Feb 1996 15:43:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from crh.cl.msu.edu (crh.cl.msu.edu [35.8.1.24]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA10363 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 1996 15:43:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from henrich@localhost) by crh.cl.msu.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id SAA02241; Wed, 21 Feb 1996 18:41:24 -0500 From: Charles Henrich Message-Id: <199602212341.SAA02241@crh.cl.msu.edu> Subject: Re: Woah! cdrom.com! To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 18:41:24 -0500 (EST) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199602212253.OAA01582@Root.COM> from "David Greenman" at Feb 21, 96 02:53:18 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8a] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > >Waitaminute, is that an ethernet I see between MCI and CRL? > > This is the second report we've gotten about this, and the last one had a > nearly identical traceroute - MCI through mae-east. The last one I analyzed > showed that the problem was the MCI -> MAE-east hop, not the MAE-east -> CRL > hop. I don't know what to say about this other than it appears to me to be an > MCI problem. CRL has future plans to upgrade their connection to MAE-east to >DS3 (it is currently 10Mbits), but in this case it appears that it's not going >to matter. :-( Can one send in a problem report to MCI to get the routing from MCI to CRL to go through the PacBell NAP? -Crh Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu http://rs560.msu.edu/~henrich/