Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:37:15 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 210258] net/iperf3: build fails - TAILQ_END doesn't exist Message-ID: <bug-210258-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210258 Bug ID: 210258 Summary: net/iperf3: build fails - TAILQ_END doesn't exist Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: peter@FreeBSD.org When compiling (on 11.x in case it matters): iperf_api.c:2600:67: warning: implicit declaration of function 'TAILQ_END' = is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] for (irp =3D TAILQ_FIRST(&sp->result->interval_results); irp !=3D TAILQ_END(sp->result->interval_results); irp =3D nirp) { ^ And later: libtool: link: cc -g -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall= -g -fstack-protector -o .libs/iperf3 iperf3-main.o ./.libs/libiperf.so -Wl,-r= path -Wl,/usr/local/lib ./.libs/libiperf.so: undefined reference to `TAILQ_END' cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) This is strange code. TAILQ_END() doesn't normally exist - it looks like it= is meant to be TAILQ_LAST() Usage examples: /sys/kern/uipc_mqueue.c: if (msg->msg_prio <=3D TAILQ_LAST(&mq->mq_msgq, msgq)->msg_prio) { /sys/kern/vfs_subr.c: bp->b_lblkno > TAILQ_LAST(&bv->bv_hd, buflists)->b_lblkno) /sys/kern/vfs_subr.c: bp =3D TAILQ_LAST(&bv->bv_hd, buflists); Note that there's a type field in the macro, so presumably there is more to= it than a simple typo. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-210258-13>