Date: Sat, 15 Apr 1995 14:36:27 -0400 From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> To: Brian Tao <taob@aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Processes not dying! Message-ID: <9504151836.AA11786@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.950415020833.191E-100000@aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw> References: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950414090033.14236A-100000@ain.charm.net> <Pine.BSI.3.91.950415020833.191E-100000@aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Sat, 15 Apr 1995 02:10:42 +0800 (CST), Brian Tao <taob@aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw> said: > Doesn't wuarchive suggest soft, interruptible mounts for exactly > this reason? On that subject, is there any disadvantage to mounting > NFS drives soft,intr? Could be make mount_nfs default to these two > options, or would that be going against some long-standing UNIX > tradition? `soft,intr' breaks traditional UNIX filesystem semantics even more than regular NFS does. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9504151836.AA11786>