Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:40:14 -0400 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Jim Pazarena <fports@paz.bz> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: csup vs portsnap was: fresh install of kde4 fails -> japanese/kiten Message-ID: <CAF6rxgmdOq2K8Qz-Fke872KffMQDUtOCCVNNkFmk%2B5%2BZvFKK5g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <503E50F2.9000809@paz.bz> References: <503BEB67.3040106@paz.bz> <CAJp7RHarRcvS4vcymHPZ54JYAbxB5AgHae=mMmgjNoA0kv_Dig@mail.gmail.com> <503BFA2D.1080606@paz.bz> <CAJp7RHarZPB-YHsXeO4oGMLaraKGD_mLOU2ovsQBh8Sh4GBgMw@mail.gmail.com> <503C0BDC.6020106@paz.bz> <CAJp7RHazu9gP6GYg3kJ4xWtsF11vbevGhffBVCRA7B0AB68U-w@mail.gmail.com> <503D8ACA.1040907@paz.bz> <CAJp7RHavJfGjSrXFn9Az5kcbXDULUypP%2BqrhVs3nzEgjx9kRSg@mail.gmail.com> <503E2E9D.2010005@paz.bz> <CAJp7RHZ5jRKrH0ZoJ2BWzrhEhhbA%2BO441M43cvEA1e1ZObsBjA@mail.gmail.com> <503E50F2.9000809@paz.bz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29 August 2012 13:27, Jim Pazarena <fports@paz.bz> wrote: > I am concerned, now, because I would have assumed that csup > actually DOES update me, where it would seem that it has a failing, > at least WRT japanese/kiten > > Which is the recommended way to stay PORT current? portsnap or csup? > I will switch to portsnap, but it is pretty slow compared to csup. both usually work. Sometimes some csup mirrors get a bit out of date due to timing or maintenance. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgmdOq2K8Qz-Fke872KffMQDUtOCCVNNkFmk%2B5%2BZvFKK5g>