Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 10:31:41 +0300 From: Valentin Nechayev <netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Subject: Re: gcc bug? Openoffice port impossibel to compile on 4.8 Message-ID: <20030531073141.GA5288@iv.nn.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <xzpr86g2b9y.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0305221020170.82473-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <20030528231134.GE23471@spc.org> <xzpr86ib50f.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <200305301727.06623.wes@softweyr.com> <xzpr86g2b9y.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sat, May 31, 2003 at 02:46:33, des (Dag-Erling Smorgrav) wrote about "Re: gcc bug? Openoffice port impossibel to compile on 4.8":
DES> and "obsolescent feature" is defined as follows in the introduction:
DES> [#2] Certain features are obsolescent, which means that they
DES> may be considered for withdrawal in future revisions of this
~~~~~~ ~~~~~~
DES> International Standard. They are retained because of their
DES> widespread use, but their use in new implementations (for
~~~
DES> implementation features) or new programs (for language
~~~
DES> [6.11] or library features [7.26]) is discouraged.
Essential words are understriked. I can't imagine how it can be read
as "unsupported".
-netch-
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030531073141.GA5288>