From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 2 05:56:47 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id FAA16620 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 2 Mar 1995 05:56:47 -0800 Received: from dns.netvision.net.il (root@dns.NetVision.net.il [194.90.1.5]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA16612 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 1995 05:56:43 -0800 Received: from ugen.NetManage.co.il (ugen.netmanage.co.il [192.114.78.165]) by dns.netvision.net.il (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA07186; Thu, 2 Mar 1995 15:54:27 +0200 Date: Thu, 2 Mar 95 15:38:30 IST From: "Ugen J.S.Antsilevich" Subject: Re: Playing with ipfw... To: Luigi Rizzo , Richard Wackerbarth Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org, ugen@netvision.net.il X-Mailer: Chameleon 4.00-Arm-25, TCP/IP for Windows, NetManage Inc. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >perhaps the external language could accept > >"ipfw addf accept udp between 0/0 520 and 0/0" > >and expand it into the two non-symetrical rules. Yeh..i think i already talked with someone about possibility of completely different extarnal language expanding to firewall entries.. This is something one can do even now..Well..firewall itself will change anyway but such language can give user a good choice..my ipfw interface is just straightforward interface to ipfw iocontrols..:)) -- -=Ugen J.S.Antsilevich=- NetVision - Israeli Commercial Internet | Learning E-mail: ugen@NetVision.net.il | To Fly. [c] Phone : +972-4-550330 |