Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:56:14 +0400 From: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@FreeBSD.org> To: =?UTF-8?B?w5Z6a2FuIEtJUklL?= <ozkan.kirik@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ipfw <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: ipfw table add problem Message-ID: <529259DE.2040701@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAAcX-AEt_i8RUfmMy6WLnER0X=uLk5A1=oj911k-nyMJEghRLw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAAcX-AGDZbFn5RmhLBBn2PPWRPcsFUnea5MgTc7nuXGD8Ge53A@mail.gmail.com> <52911993.8010108@ipfw.ru> <CAAcX-AEt_i8RUfmMy6WLnER0X=uLk5A1=oj911k-nyMJEghRLw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2JKWEJWRTHEUCKVBDGILP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 24.11.2013 19:43, =C3=96zkan KIRIK wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I tested patch. This patch solves, ipfw table 1 add 4899 Ok. So I'll commit this fix soon. >=20 > But, ipfw table 1 add 10.2.3.01 works incorrectly. > output is below. > # ./ipfw table 1 flush > # ./ipfw table 1 add 10.2.3.01 inet_pton() does not recognize this as valid IPv4 address, so it is treated as usigned unteger key. It looks like this behavior is mentioned in STANDARDS section. > # ./ipfw table 1 list > 0.0.0.10/32 0 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov > <melifaro@ipfw.ru>wrote: >=20 > On 19.11.2013 23:55, =EF=BF=96zkan KIRIK wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm using kernel FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 #2 r257635 kernel. I am trying >>>> to add port number to ipfw tables. But there is something strange >>>> : Problem is easily repeatable. >>>> >>>> #ipfw table 1 flush #ipfw table 1 add 4899 #ipfw table 1 list ::/0 >>>> 0 >>>> >>>> #ipfw table 1 flush #ipfw table 1 add 10.2.3.01 ( not >>>> 10.0.0.1, the last 1 has 0 as prefix ) #ipfw table 1 list ::/0 0 >>>> >>>> #ipfw table 1 delete ::/0 ipfw: setsockopt(IP_FW_TABLE_XDEL): No >>>> such process >>>> >>>> >>>> I guess that, this problem is related to radix mask calculation >>>> problem/fix. > Hello. > I'm sorry, it seems that key lookups were broken for quite a long time.= >=20 > Can you apply attached patch, rebuild ipfw(8) binary and see if this > helps? >=20 >=20 >>>> >>>> Is there a quick solution for this. Best, regards, >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To >>>> unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >=20 >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"= >=20 ------enig2JKWEJWRTHEUCKVBDGILP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlKSWeMACgkQwcJ4iSZ1q2njZACfdD3Slr+nei3etHXm83sRilmD 2hoAoICRbULOBCyJMBFXqMW6but3XSS4 =FFua -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2JKWEJWRTHEUCKVBDGILP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?529259DE.2040701>