From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 9 16:11:16 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F788CD85AC for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4546D8 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 299BCCD85AB; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27862CD85AA for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:4400:216:3eff:fe69:33b3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mouf.net", Issuer "mouf.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E509E6D7 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:11:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.0.1.70] (cpe-071-065-239-148.nc.res.rr.com [71.65.239.148] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id v19GB2nU000999 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:11:08 GMT (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?! To: Franco Fichtner References: <1c6cccac-b151-d13c-c763-b336c4680118@freebsd.org> <35a953e3-918b-fc32-d990-51f7da16c884@FreeBSD.org> <451770c6-f2d3-6ca4-183e-532ea5f1ee89@FreeBSD.org> <192DBE4D-339A-4645-8C88-AE8BAD344346@lastsummer.de> Cc: scratch65535@att.net, freebsd-ports From: Steve Wills Message-ID: Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 11:10:58 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <192DBE4D-339A-4645-8C88-AE8BAD344346@lastsummer.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="60cjegjPk2bTljNL0NlBkifVbiGHVK34r" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mouf.net [199.48.129.64]); Thu, 09 Feb 2017 16:11:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,PLING_QUERY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mouf.net X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 16:11:16 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --60cjegjPk2bTljNL0NlBkifVbiGHVK34r Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="e00nHBXFTdf0MSrXdf0HHJwgPIAIcX2Q2"; protected-headers="v1" From: Steve Wills To: Franco Fichtner Cc: scratch65535@att.net, freebsd-ports Message-ID: Subject: Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?! References: <1c6cccac-b151-d13c-c763-b336c4680118@freebsd.org> <35a953e3-918b-fc32-d990-51f7da16c884@FreeBSD.org> <451770c6-f2d3-6ca4-183e-532ea5f1ee89@FreeBSD.org> <192DBE4D-339A-4645-8C88-AE8BAD344346@lastsummer.de> In-Reply-To: <192DBE4D-339A-4645-8C88-AE8BAD344346@lastsummer.de> --e00nHBXFTdf0MSrXdf0HHJwgPIAIcX2Q2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On 02/09/2017 11:01, Franco Fichtner wrote: >=20 >> On 9 Feb 2017, at 4:47 PM, Steve Wills wrote: >> >> They're supposed to upgrade to a supported version of FreeBSD. >=20 > pkg won't refuse the upgrade. And at least if it upgraded, it > should not break itself. Even if the update of pkg were done before the upgrade of the OS, if the user ran "freebsd-update" to upgrade to 10.3, the version of pkg that it updated to would work properly. > Imagine a GUI-driven appliance being bricked. There is nobody > who can tell it "fetch ports and build pkg to keep using it". Vendors should be building their own packages. > Don't get me wrong. Automation around pkg is really good, though > that doesn't warrant it's perfect (yet). I agree it's good, and nothing is ever perfect. Steve --e00nHBXFTdf0MSrXdf0HHJwgPIAIcX2Q2-- --60cjegjPk2bTljNL0NlBkifVbiGHVK34r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGnBAEBCgCRFiEEmPpBSlwqDvnP0K0N9c9isyB7G6EFAliclJJfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDk4 RkE0MTRBNUMyQTBFRjlDRkQwQUQwREY1Q0Y2MkIzMjA3QjFCQTETHHN3aWxsc0Bm cmVlYnNkLm9yZwAKCRD1z2KzIHsbocnhB/91AMbXXkmvv5gmw+9Ryo6ENF6UxFN1 WTMjqgOpv7afm9dzuD1m1xq4K+PpSaRa2K5ND1VZIs3cszNHUTBokeHoWDRliB1o eFAkbHRShE8oX4v+Ow1yG+QkV0Mj1pT0eORLFLNd30aJbyHWU5muO1hLp8NNQw7r nGI2C5Evy18miJJzS/EYT8GRWuHvgOLraivd2cLU/TqkWgXRGMKTSGFnPLD2C/jy pTFHMc2OpD4d4pCQMcPpZSv9MKJAQU46tQu6lPfy/dtF/OErVl/ltuGpLNICww3l flXRnUQo6molzmbU0LlkuAtaR6H2+XapXGk46YscZDutqIFnjuCfJJzi =JCq4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --60cjegjPk2bTljNL0NlBkifVbiGHVK34r--