Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Oct 2004 09:11:28 +0200
From:      Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>, Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ??  don't want all ports
Message-ID:  <F3DEF096F3CB623D28DE465B@[192.168.1.5]>
In-Reply-To: <20041019203807.20774f6f.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>
References:  <417448AC.30607@speakeasy.net> <41753C00.1020506@speakeasy.net> <200410191840.43045.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <20041019203807.20774f6f.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


+-Le 19/10/2004 20:38 +0200, Miguel Mendez a dit :
| On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:40:41 +0200
| Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> wrote:
| 
| Hi,
| 
|> On Tuesday, 19. October 2004 18:08, wayn wrote:
|> > works just fine, yes.  but portsdb -U doesn't.  make index doesn't.
|> > make fetchindex does, though.  i'll just have to remember to do it
|> > as soon as i update my ports tree.
|> 
|> I wonder what became of the portindex-replacement flynn started...
| 
| I'm still working on it. I haven't made much progress though, mainly
| thanks to last week's flu and an increased load at work. There's some
| java stuff that needs to be finished first, but I'll try to have
| something I can show as soon as I can. I'm still not sure C is the
| appropriate language for this kind of task. Perhaps it's time to give
| ruby a try. I'll post the news as soon as I have something worth showing
| (read: not as broken as the current code is) and maybe move it to a
| public repo (e.g. sourceforge) to let other people work on it as well.

Yeah, I was thinking you could put that somewhere so ppl could test/help.
On the ruby side, maybe it could be a patch for knu's portupgrade.

-- 
Mathieu Arnold



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F3DEF096F3CB623D28DE465B>