From owner-freebsd-java Thu Mar 1 23:26:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from osku.suutari.iki.fi (osku.syncrontech.com [213.28.98.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD1537B718 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 23:26:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Received: from coffee (adsl-nat.syncrontech.com [213.28.98.3]) by osku.suutari.iki.fi (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA23134; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 09:26:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Message-ID: <05ce01c0a2ea$0cb6afc0$0e05a8c0@coffee> From: "Ari Suutari" To: "Ari Suutari" , "Nate Williams" , "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" Cc: "Nate Williams" , "FreeBSD Java" References: <3A9AE85F.C6F06D96@vangelderen.org><15002.60084.89087.467979@nomad.yogotech.com><3A9EF71F.A13189C6@vangelderen.org> <15006.63617.145790.5705@nomad.yogotech.com> <05bd01c0a2e9$a1b669e0$0e05a8c0@coffee> Subject: Re: Are syscall wrappers needed in JNI? Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 09:26:08 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, Replying to myself.... > What this > means that it *IS* safe to call methods that are wrapped by > JVM. methods -> functions (too much oo stuff in brains). I also forgot to say that to my understanding one can call functions with their real names (not the ones beginning with JVM_) because of the behaviour of loader I explained in previous e-mail. Ari S. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message