Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:17:32 +0200 From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, office@freebsd.org, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>, Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: libreoffice fails to build Message-ID: <50085D4C.60901@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20488.23232.578561.75939@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <20486.55903.34769.952614@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <500729B3.1050208@FreeBSD.org> <20487.20506.88401.623249@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <CADLo83-0gak%2B8kBpmg6jUdeHcrYC65CEqCg1SciFe5TXiceM6g@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1sPkuPTt0BtWNoavA-o2FRbEPjwRL88bzR_pC5qyNJenw@mail.gmail.com> <20488.23232.578561.75939@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012-07-19 21:06, Robert Huff wrote: ... > Let me be clear: > There is at least one person out there who has successfully > built LibreOffice 3.5.5 using (system) clang 3.2? The version of clang in base is 3.1. I have successfully compiled LibreOffice with it, and it even seemed to run OK, though I didn't test it very thoroughly. There were several other posters which confirmed the same. Apparently in r301038, jkim updated the libreoffice port to use the lang/clang-devel port instead, which is built from a very recent 3.2 snapshot. I have no idea if LO compiles successfully with that. Maybe you found a problem with the clang-devel port. :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50085D4C.60901>