Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 19:06:30 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r305135 - head/ports-mgmt/pkg Message-ID: <20121001170630.GF70616@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <5069C8FE.4040405@FreeBSD.org> References: <201210011633.q91GXKPO079069@svn.freebsd.org> <5069C8FE.4040405@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--eNMatiwYGLtwo1cJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:46:54AM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 10/1/2012 11:33 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Author: bapt > > Date: Mon Oct 1 16:33:19 2012 > > New Revision: 305135 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/305135 > >=20 > > Log: > > Mark as not ccache safe > > =20 > > Reported by: Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@gmail.com> > >=20 >=20 >=20 > How is this not ccache safe? >=20 > The WITH_CCACHE_BUILD support does not break any ports as it just > updates PATH, and I have been using ccache on pkg for months now fine. >=20 > Bryan I received at least 2 reports of users saying it is not ccache safe. I manage to build it with ccache activated, but I imagine there should be r= ough edges and trust the users saying it doesn't work for them. regards, Bapt --eNMatiwYGLtwo1cJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlBpzZYACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExLNACffjvYTJZgGDif5RUmU3V2on12 AlIAoKEk+bj5RiskdrE5suBSKrQqfKh2 =kFX7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eNMatiwYGLtwo1cJ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121001170630.GF70616>