From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Oct 3 16: 0:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C391137B403 for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 16:00:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f93N03r22666; Wed, 3 Oct 2001 16:00:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 16:00:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200110032300.f93N03r22666@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: John Merryweather Cooper Subject: Re: kern/30061: Modify agp_via.c to recognize VIA Apollo KT133A Reply-To: John Merryweather Cooper Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/30061; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Merryweather Cooper To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, jmcoopr@webmail.bmi.net Cc: Subject: Re: kern/30061: Modify agp_via.c to recognize VIA Apollo KT133A Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 15:59:59 -0700 I "hear" rumors that some/all of what I have discussed in this PR has been applied to -CURRENT (but I don't know for sure as I don't have a -CURRENT machine). Given the relative innocuous nature of these patches (code is strictly concerned with correctly ID'ing installed hardware and does not (currently) affect kernel function in any way, is there a special reason these patch(s) have not been MFC'ed? Also, it would be nice to have someone "responsible," especially if work is actually be done on it somewhere. -- jmc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message