Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:03:51 -0800 (PST) From: Lamont Granquist <lamont@scriptkiddie.org> To: Mike Meyer <mwm-keyword-freebsdhackers2.e313df@mired.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, Vulpes Velox <v.velox@vvelox.net> Subject: Re: LDAP integration Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.60.0701111201580.2433@sploit.scriptkiddie.org> In-Reply-To: <17830.29050.791321.480369@bhuda.mired.org> References: <60737.24.71.119.183.1168496463.squirrel@webmail.sd73.bc.ca> <45A5EA3B.9020000@datalinktech.com.au> <20070111035549.7c11a450@vixen42> <17830.29050.791321.480369@bhuda.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Mike Meyer wrote: > In <20070111035549.7c11a450@vixen42>, Vulpes Velox <v.velox@vvelox.net> typed: >> LDAP is nice organizing across many systems, but if you are just >> dealing with one computer it is complete over kill for any thing. > > In that situation, it's not merely overkill, it's may actually be a > bad idea. Can you say "AIX SDR"? How about "Windows registry"? And then you take the windows registry from 1,000 machines and cram them into a centralized database and try to manage the resultant mess. I don't think this is a good solution.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.60.0701111201580.2433>