From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun 26 08:18:30 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6DF1065670;
	Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:18:30 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com)
Received: from mail-ew0-f213.google.com (mail-ew0-f213.google.com
	[209.85.219.213])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A9808FC1B;
	Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:18:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com)
Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so1598770ewy.43
	for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to
	:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=IJiNyu0OrGldYKEkvnRk/mmqqJ9vvdgGWHyg9ZdElMo=;
	b=KjPkzB55OCRkpIHSw0UDoxfkw+QjR/M0+vf0LCyxjk8ndfPfaIUW+HuEKqU7U28tPu
	3VrWAZqEkKztxo/gIBsmAl29nnpDnqsIUesTWXYvc5NcVoXbCN4SjFf87zII6Dqc2CnV
	L4EVZJPgMjyulzLWI3eqz4H3RCiZZSoqzWlg4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
	:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=E7ASS9iM5DictNBiZaV0vTSy9+7qYlh4FhmtEKT+mDd0ctGA95UBDmkecIJwh9oo9x
	v2+VzwX6WcHz62ILrptDYlwtFYb4jOaBuPuT0PE1bWeSxUkBkh1M+AyC1WwmCwR2lFxU
	gPn1p35ZA4MhVO7LcNXWuEP941jDciOT5WEdY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.25.144 with SMTP id z16mr1081570wez.179.1246004309091; 
	Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <e71790db0906251751g23bead87ped37a90c4a067024@mail.gmail.com>
References: <200906181114.43935.tabthorpe@freebsd.org>
	<200906231506.05001.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> 
	<20090623203608.GB15815@comcast.net>
	<200906240956.10625.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> 
	<4a4312cd.yWDVqdLjAXRTY5Bn%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
	<b79ecaef0906250124w4254e1dcve32f916d2e077eec@mail.gmail.com> 
	<e71790db0906251751g23bead87ped37a90c4a067024@mail.gmail.com>
From: Chris Rees <utisoft@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:18:09 +0100
Message-ID: <b79ecaef0906260118m31525ae2y8e84b40df3ddcc48@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <unixmania@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: corky1951@comcast.net, perryh@pluto.rain.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org,
	tabthorpe@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:18:31 -0000

2009/6/26 Carlos A. M. dos Santos <unixmania@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Chris Rees<utisoft@googlemail.com> wrote=
:
>> 2009/6/25 =A0<perryh@pluto.rain.com>:
>>>> > If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and
>>>> > internationalization is too long, why not go with "nls"?
>>>>
>>>> I personally think that nls is equally as cryptic as i18n or l10n.
>>>
>>> Anyone care for "intlzn"? =A0It's short, should still tab-complete
>>> from "in", and it may be a bit less cryptic than nls, i18n, or l10n.
>>
>> I was thinking intl, but your suggestion's better.
>
> Guys, you have been discussing the category *name* for eight days now
> without reaching a consensus. This is becoming somewhat boring. Please
> do not reinvent the wheel. Whether you like it or not, i18n is a well
> established and widely accepted acronym.
>

Very sorry, we'll shut up and have it YOUR way.

Chris

--=20
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in a mailing list?