From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec 26 18:55:21 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32587106564A;
	Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:55:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from barbara.xxx1975@libero.it)
Received: from outrelay01.libero.it (outrelay01.libero.it [212.52.84.101])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D368FC0A;
	Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:55:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0206.4EF8C317.00B6,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0
X-libjamoibt: 1821
Received: from wmail52 (172.31.0.243) by outrelay01.libero.it (8.5.140)
	(authenticated as barbara.xxx1975@libero.it)
	id 4EF8AB9A00018F84; Mon, 26 Dec 2011 19:55:19 +0100
Message-ID: <8160906.7577941324925719517.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 19:55:19 +0100 (CET)
From: Barbara <barbara.xxx1975@libero.it>
To: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SenderIP: 95.246.227.16
Cc: rene@freebsd.org
Subject: net-p2p/amule and net-p2p/amule-devel maintainership
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Barbara <barbara.xxx1975@libero.it>
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 18:55:21 -0000


As the amule* ports have currently no maintainer and I've submitted pr/patches 
to upgrade to recent versions, I was asked to take the maintainership of both 
ports.
That it's not a problem for me and I'll be glad to take care of them.

Anyway I'm wondering if someone else is motivated to claim the maintainership.
In the meanwhile, I'm kindly asking rene@ to commit the changes needed to set 
me as maintainer for both.