Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Apr 1999 13:51:36 +0930
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        Kent Stewart <kstewart@3-cities.com>, Missouri FreeNet Administration <measl@mfn.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Resolution: k6-2/400 and 2.2x
Message-ID:  <19990412135136.N2142@lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <37115402.CBA31DC5@3-cities.com>; from Kent Stewart on Sun, Apr 11, 1999 at 07:01:38PM -0700
References:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.990411202704.489A-100000@pub2.mfn.org> <37115402.CBA31DC5@3-cities.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday, 11 April 1999 at 19:01:38 -0700, Kent Stewart wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Apr 1999, Kent Stewart wrote:
>>> Missouri FreeNet Administration wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 12 Apr 1999 09:31:41 +0930, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> wrote:
>>>> <snip>
>>>>> What kind of disks and controller are you using?
>>>> Controllers are on the motherboard (Asus P5A-B).
>>>>
>>>>> What chipset?
>>>> ALi AGPset.  100mhz front end bus, Western Digital 1.6gb IDE drive,
>>>> Standard 3.5" Mitsumi floppy, 32mb of 100mhz SDRAM, Generic 4 mb PCI video
>>>> card, SMC800x Network Card: all known to be good.  As I said, this system,
>>>> unchanged, boots and runs NT4/SP4, RHL 5.2, etc...
>>>>
>>>>> Does it freeze, or does it hang?
>>>> It hangs.  CTL-ALT-DEL still reboots, numlock still functions, etc.  It
>>>> appears to read the first boot sector before dying.
>>>>
>>>>> Does it still occur if you go back to a 66 MHz bus speed?
>>>> Unknown right now: I will try it later this weekend.
>>>>
>>>>> I suppose it's possible that there is an incompatibility with 2.2.5R,
>>>>> just that we haven't seen it, and it's unlikely to be directly related
>>>>> to the processor.  But it would still make sense to install
>>>>> FreeBSD-3.1, since you're not going to get much help following a real
>>>>> bug in 2.2.5.
>>>> I wasn't aware that 3.1 was out: last I checked, 3.0 was available, but,
>>>> to paraphrase the FBSD warning: "3.0 [was] not ready for prime time" ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Is there continuing support for 2.2.8R? We are *very* pleased with the
>>>> 2.2.x series, and are not exactly thrilled at changing over to the 3.x
>>>> line... (Why fix something thats not only not [usually] broken, but
>>>> usually picture perfect???)
>>>
>>> I had problems with WD drives and non-DOS mbr. I found an
>>> incompatability between SMART and the bios. You start the power up
>>> sequence, it counts through memory, and then it checks the hard drive
>>> and hangs. I had to use a startup disk from Win98 to "fdisk /mbr",
>>> left that mbr in place and my problems went away.
>>
>> This was it!  Once I disable S.M.A.R.T., the problem disappeared!
>>
>> THANKS!
>
> I don't know what it is but the FreeBSD mbr sure trashes some of the
> new systems. You were lucky. I couldn't turn off SMART.

OK, this looks like the discussion we had about "dangerously
dedicated" disks.  If your BIOS requires a Microsoft partition table
at the beginning of the disk, you're going to have to install a
Microsoft partition table at the beginning of the disk.

Greg
--
When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients.
For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html
See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers
finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990412135136.N2142>