From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 21 08:19:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E8EA74C for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 08:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9BF2B82 for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 08:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from AlfredMacbookAir.local (unknown [50.204.88.5]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D17A1A3C1B; Wed, 21 May 2014 01:19:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <537C6195.5000509@mu.org> Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 01:19:33 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Cederstrand Subject: Re: [GSoC] Machine readable output from userland utilities References: <49E9736E-AD14-4647-8B15-30603D01360C@mail.bg> <91FE2526-F21C-42AB-BECB-058DBA975A9E@cederstrand.dk> <537C2993.1060206@mu.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 08:19:35 -0000 On 5/20/14, 11:17 PM, Erik Cederstrand wrote: > Den 21/05/2014 kl. 06.20 skrev Alfred Perlstein : > >> In all seriousness though, the real target is people writing higher level languages (than shell) on top of FreeBSD. Perhaps python or ruby spawning a utility and then that utility making the output easy to read. > If that's the use case, than I'm fine with this. I often find I need to combine Python and shell output (working with dates in shell is horrible, for example), and formalized output would simplify some scripts considerably. Yes exactly. I've given some preliminary talks and devops people eyes light up with excitement. thank you, -Alfred