Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:39:29 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/nvidia-driver Makefile pkg-plist Message-ID: <20060320213929.GC77974@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060320211044.GA18900@FreeBSD.org> References: <200603201608.k2KG8kxQ015282@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060320173744.GA72724@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060320211044.GA18900@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 09:10:44PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 12:37:44PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 04:08:46PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > danfe 2006-03-20 16:08:46 UTC > > >=20 > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > >=20 > > > Modified files: > > > x11/nvidia-driver Makefile pkg-plist=20 > > > Log: > > > - Xorg 6.9 uses the .so extension instead of .a for the server exte= nsions. > > > Fix the pkg-plist for that [1] > > > - Remove the USE_REINPLACE since it is no longer needed [1] > > > =20 > > > Please note that 4.X users will probably suffer from this as a side > > > effect, however, taking them into account will further complicate t= he > > > Makefile logic, which is already pretty hard to follow. Since I wa= rned > > > 4.X users about removing support for that old release of FreeBSD (a= nd > > > since I'd be really suprised to find out there's someone still using > > > 4.X as their desktop) more than 8 months ago, plus we're not oblige= d to > > > support ports on 4.X anymore, I think we can live with it. > >=20 > > Only if you mark the port IGNORE on 4.x so it tells them up-front. >=20 > I deliberately did not bump PORTREVISION [*] to minimize effect on 4.x us= ers > (presuming they already have nvidia-driver port installed and registered > properly). >=20 > Nonetheless, I'm thinking of more perfect way of dealing with this issue > right now, and in case I could not get one promptly, I'll IGNORE it on > 4.x or find other canonically-proper way to fix it. >=20 > >=20 > > Dear committer: you have many other ports that you also need to > > annotate with BROKEN/IGNORE (or fix). I hope you'll do so soon > > instead of committing new ones :-) >=20 > Despite the fact you're quite right, and I'm very aware of those and > fixes will follow promptly, I'd appreciate if such assessments were > sent privately. Fair enough, sorry. Kris --0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEHyERWry0BWjoQKURAnFwAKCGgx2LcYlNKywvelB/m6qXyZGoWACgzXF9 8JLFDEhlpKgsAN/5TYdSQ5E= =iKzu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0lnxQi9hkpPO77W3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060320213929.GC77974>