Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 10:34:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990624103334.2194A-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <E10xBrD-0000S5-00@fanf.noc.demon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the tests they used both Zeus AND Apache On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Tony Finch wrote: > Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> wrote: > > > >Sorry to follow up on my own message, but I noted today in PCWeek > >their trip back to the benchmark lab includes ripping 3 CPUs and > >768M RAM out of the system, to benchmark how Linux and NT perform > >on "lower-end" hardware. They also allowed the RedHat dudes to > >switch to an Adaptec SCSI controller to talk to the RAID array. > >How are we holding up under this "diminished" configuration? > > It's stupid to tune everything for performance except for the web > server -- they should be using Zeus, not Apache. > > Tony. > -- > f.a.n.finch dot@dotat.at fanf@demon.net > Winner, International Obfuscated C Code Competition 1998 > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.990624103334.2194A-100000>