From owner-freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Wed Jul 13 13:47:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1452CB97CE3 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:47:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03D7417AD for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:47:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u6DDlSPs082594 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:47:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211028] [GEOM][Hyper-V] gpart can't detect the new free space after the disk capacity changes Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:47:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: trasz@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:47:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211028 --- Comment #9 from Edward Tomasz Napierala --- Hm. Okay. The read dd works, because the da(4) driver gets notified about= the capacity change on the first read command sent to the disk; basically the d= isk responds with Unit Attention indicating this. The write dd works, because = it forces GEOM retaste. So it still fits the theory that GEOM itself is fine,= and it's just g_part(4) not handling it properly. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=