From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Nov 6 5:45:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from straylight.ringlet.net (sentinel.office1.bg [217.75.134.126]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08E3337B43F for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2001 05:45:17 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 63343 invoked by uid 1000); 6 Nov 2001 13:16:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 15:16:01 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev To: "Julian C. Dunn" Cc: petef@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/31545: port update: adzapper Message-ID: <20011106151601.I10023@straylight.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: "Julian C. Dunn" , petef@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <200111061116.fA6BG8x59950@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jdunn@aquezada.com on Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 08:37:41AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 08:37:41AM -0500, Julian C. Dunn wrote: > Ooh. I don't think anything changed. The developer possibly just rerolled the > tarball. Do you have a copy of the old tarball to make sure that actually nothing changed? It is not very likely, but it just might be possible that somebody has compromised the site and put a different tarball in place.. G'luck, Peter -- If there were no counterfactuals, this sentence would not have been paradoxical. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message