Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 May 2014 01:24:53 -0700
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [GSoC] Machine readable output from userland utilities
Message-ID:  <537C62D5.9030503@mu.org>
In-Reply-To: <2ac30e8c9d22b09dacb4446722a5b61e.authenticated@ultimatedns.net>
References:  <49E9736E-AD14-4647-8B15-30603D01360C@mail.bg> <91FE2526-F21C-42AB-BECB-058DBA975A9E@cederstrand.dk> <537C2993.1060206@mu.org> <f17ef374463361cc4d42009f7b418f67.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <537C335C.3060105@mu.org> <2ac30e8c9d22b09dacb4446722a5b61e.authenticated@ultimatedns.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 5/20/14, 10:51 PM, Chris H wrote:
>> On 5/20/14, 9:58 PM, Chris H wrote:
>>>>
>>> Greetings, all.
>>> I may be getting into this thread a bit late in the game. But if I
>>> understand the gist of this correctly; isn't all this pretty much what
>>> Perl was intended for?
>>>
>>> All the best.
>> I can't tell if you're late or early since the connection is breaking
>> up, but from what I can make out you're stuck in 1997.
> LOL. That's good. :)
> I'm clearly missing something -- no, not the 21st century. ;)
> But just for the record; I meant nothing negative by my assertion.
> It just /seemed/ like Perl would/could be capable.
Perl would be perfectly capable if it was 1997.

What are you suggesting?  Seriously?



-Alfred



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?537C62D5.9030503>