From owner-svn-src-stable@freebsd.org Wed Jun 8 19:03:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFE0B6FA50; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:03:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x22f.google.com (mail-it0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B10B41860; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:03:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id a5so18374970ita.1; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 12:03:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=rY2gUYBLgGoqVQ8NtgrEkrTYkVW+hlB6sNlRTDqEmQ4=; b=cOdKKQhg4JdfF6OnnX67QjTCGMdsZFwnVzhFA3Zm/RBrK11TEk09MpI9pZhUP/LXwY lvLbHkAumEjbX6dgASmEBRqJ1a8eJwgcq/3P/lIWXR7ltx/sns5GY1y8PNsIv2aTrmXs riXZTvsY9ufzqg1sQL0qLsbe4Y0DgOKfmfTv/FmR7rfsXPOBXOcTfDQDSxqbZOHxwrZi 0i+5ByHgREM4+8Tq3GXCZfUwttkcZbx8/a0shCPyTbCsDhOs9rnC27DDu5Ngjwnxr/ep q0+H8UA4Jy/SIkEuzEAUSaqnOIrmcXAGY1lYnOQLP3afxo+C8+Z6Sn0OJ1rO65/NPvTW UDiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=rY2gUYBLgGoqVQ8NtgrEkrTYkVW+hlB6sNlRTDqEmQ4=; b=MWxwIc8e+xPP0UKbAKvEudYouysBApoMZvK30vY4GZZ0+68f6g0dmi65IACpNoQzw4 +qokyIyw+BtmIGCl7F9Dm4S2SxrFpMJTI3/0d2W5FlicSgNWb+IvonzazqoY+H/oiD58 adkfw09qMThCigenskZVidHq3hW+kyKkWL9Hm4pHgZby4RuFFA/esbLTfj7SnlMb7JhV P3RFr437HwSZfjTIkLTk8gPNa/+1K7UlH9a8XBHV36wZXHocVtQA7TmRxjItxL6sbaic LB/j+5oyb7pXjM5nLeEkqBtzZ/w0hqasp4BqSW2xj/hujUWWxKAIyCooZZ9hDZJqhYOm QQzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKJZ+UpyzlNhHKFgxCsyWlwGfwS3mTURlLPC3pU2rT+Kp/uEbtxioJ4Qh2rznkOZQ== X-Received: by 10.36.69.216 with SMTP id c85mr15152521itd.75.1465412623970; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 12:03:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.65.210.108] ([137.122.64.8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o127sm1364159ith.7.2016.06.08.12.03.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 08 Jun 2016 12:03:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: svn commit: r301681 - stable/9/sys/rpc Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E2FD5B9F-B5F2-4190-AF23-7486FD515491"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2 From: "Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)" In-Reply-To: <201606081850.u58IotT0022829@slippy.cwsent.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:03:41 -0400 Cc: Garrett Cooper , src-committers , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org Message-Id: <0DFEB3AC-B864-47B5-8261-83E68989385A@gmail.com> References: <201606081850.u58IotT0022829@slippy.cwsent.com> To: Cy Schubert X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for all the -stable branches of the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 19:03:45 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_E2FD5B9F-B5F2-4190-AF23-7486FD515491 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On Jun 8, 2016, at 14:50, Cy Schubert = wrote: >=20 > In message <201606081823.u58INXvL053444@repo.freebsd.org>, Garrett = Cooper > write > s: >> Author: ngie >> Date: Wed Jun 8 18:23:33 2016 >> New Revision: 301681 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/301681 >>=20 >> Log: >> MFstable/10 r301680: >>=20 >> MFC r300625: >=20 > Why MFC to stable/10 and then to stable/9. Doesn't that make stable/10 > stable/9's ancestor? When stable/9 was first branched,HEAD was its > ancestor. Doesn't this cause confusing ancestry in the branch? Good question! Yes; it makes ^/stable/10 ^/stable/9=E2=80=99s ancestor for changes from = ^/head, even though the ancestry was the other way around (^/stable/9 is = ^/stable/10=E2=80=99s ancestor, chronologically=E2=80=A6 but = content-wise ^/stable/9 is a subset really of everything in ^/stable/10 = and ^/head). There have been a few discussions about this on the = developer=E2=80=99s list, and the general consensus was a trickle down = method, i.e. =E2=80=9Cmerge from head to head-1; merge from head-1 to = head-2; etc=E2=80=9D. There=E2=80=99s some minor disagreement on content in the MFC messages, = but the way I have things right now is the preferred format AFAIK, i.e. = less people have nitpicked the messages, content-wise. After I fix the small formatting annoyance with my MFCs vs others, I was = thinking of putting out the scripts I use for CR; it would be nice for = everyone to be using the same tools. Thanks! -Ngie --Apple-Mail=_E2FD5B9F-B5F2-4190-AF23-7486FD515491 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXWGwNAAoJEPWDqSZpMIYVUk4P/RfKlkREJILEM5Q/njQbabPk eSDQw0I+8EYkfGPxbd1E15CXE44R2424gck0r4mdFm11Pm2puGIuC+4aipuggMV+ 3MN7nZgQAstIRZHUGII9TSTFyWpE8zvbkZuOkl75YlHTd0U0bj7gCuMyXrA7+ub0 NxSFm22OeqSayeysd2aut4UUCgD6gm7Pde36fZG/ZebVOLz+WEIVzklkOSpiE7X6 UfvH0qoW4WarnhNC6mTnc7fFH1RYvThRNxS5diqvVzUsCjFiOfvr6ifmHlT+p2b+ 7qxd5mQiSN8QbnEMmwIBYFaZgHFC8z5bQaMBO5R1KaKXkxO5oBfHAqI+77bfJNXy eDNIRR+Cwwebxzpg4NEexnnAfUOJC1A6UOxvHzr578+QVfWPlYd1l8o2m2u6641R nFC037FiHvUuf0frQk1r7c4ftNsoo+9qwv9u1ldTue+Yha5VAQI8/kpBZFVo5U7U 4d9k7kPnrI+3ly5lOHA8B3kxRvvxR1VYiQemKI3iyX3qZ7IkU9XtncR0hXZbxOin txjyHFsHHTqwE/2jZMLEOqzoBSyGdlqOXc2LC1NeCEHJiJMFrq3OyGxni4Lv41uh yX0IYFGR5AtNKCPhxqh2CxmQ34K8WQPgLmQgno044FKHRgknlZ38Z3FJH7hxlJt6 ZulGKhQqDq0x5bEy71Nh =RdbN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_E2FD5B9F-B5F2-4190-AF23-7486FD515491--