Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Jul 1996 09:34:18 +1000
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        dennis@etinc.com, stefan@Promo.DE
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: mitsumi CD-ROM
Message-ID:  <199607172334.JAA03113@godzilla.zeta.org.au>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>If I understand you correctly, you want the disk controller only to =
>consume resources when there is no network activity; I'm not too familiar =
>with PCI's or FBSD's arbitration logic, but I assume that FBSD will try =
>to service disk controllers before network controllers (please correct me =
>on this).

No, the priorities are only parially ordered.  Disk controllers may interrupt
nextwork controllers and vice versa.

>I'm sure one could change that with some effort to give the nic =
>the higher priority.

Tiny effort: `imp_imask |= bio_imask;'

>However, if you're intention is to really make this one router forward =
>packets with lower latency, you might want to try to run it completely =
>off MFS; then there will be no disk activity at all.

There will be, at more-unpredictable times than for a hard disk, when the
MFS fills up.

Bruce



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607172334.JAA03113>