Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 10:03:02 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> Cc: lada@ws2301.gud.siemens.co.at (Hr.Ladavac), scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD support for Adaptec/Buslogic drivers Message-ID: <E0vJ0WE-0001Qi-00@rover.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 31 Oct 1996 08:54:17 PST." <199610311654.IAA04790@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> References: <199610311654.IAA04790@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199610311654.IAA04790@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> "Rodney W. Grimes" writes: : They are not all equal, the ``cheap'' ones use passive termination, : the good ones (ASUS SC-200 and many others) use active termination. That brings up a question that I've been meaning to ask for a long time. Can someone tell me the difference between active and passive termination, or point me at something that does? In addition, why would I want one over the other? Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0vJ0WE-0001Qi-00>