From owner-freebsd-current Sat May 1 14:13:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from herring.nlsystems.com (nlsys.demon.co.uk [158.152.125.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240EA15140 for ; Sat, 1 May 1999 14:13:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Received: from localhost (dfr@localhost) by herring.nlsystems.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA66314; Sat, 1 May 1999 22:13:22 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 22:13:21 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson To: Matthew Jacob Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need testers files) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 1 May 1999, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > I agree about CVS' limitations completely. I know that a lot of Linux > > projects are under their own CVS control but what kind of history is > > available for code once it reaches Linus? Does Linus have a CVS > > repository which stores file-by-file history for the kernel? > > No. That's what Bitkeeper and some of the retroactive release stream > reconstruction that Larry's been doing is about. That sounds like it would be time well spent. I like the sound of Bitkeeper a lot. I just want someone else to test it :-). -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message