From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 25 10:13:04 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 41BA116A4CE; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 10:13:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DE48643D48; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 10:13:03 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il)
Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32])
	by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp
	id 1DEloM-0009mS-M8; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:13:02 +0200
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with nmh-1.0.4
To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: Message from Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> 
   of "Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:46:18 +0200." <20050325094618.GA76747@ip.net.ua> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:13:02 +0200
From: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
Message-ID: <E1DEloM-0009mS-M8@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il>
cc: amd64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: testers wanted 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 10:13:04 -0000


> Hi DES,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:43:04PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> > I need someone with an nForce3-based Opteron box running -CURRENT to
> > do the following:
> >=20
> >  - upgrade to a recent -CURRENT, verify that a GENERIC kernel with
> >    NO_MIXED_MODE removed works properly *with apic enabled*
> >=20
> Looks like it works, though I got one TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA with it.
> I just used a stripped down GENERIC kernel with hw.apic.mixed_mode=3D1
> set in /boot/loader.conf, which has the same effect as above.
> 
> >  - build an unmodified GENERIC (*with* NO_MIXED_MODE) from the same
> >    sources and boot it *with apic enabled*
> >=20
> Booted the same kernel with hw.apic.mixed_mode=3D0.  It stalls
> (see the attached logs).

same here, but there seems to be a problem with the network:
 Trying to mount root from nfs:
 NFS ROOT: 132.65.16.100:/d/9
 em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex
 em0: link state changed to UP
 em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex
 usb_new_device: set address 2 failed - trying a port reset
 em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex
 usb_new_device: set address 2 failed - trying a port reset
 usb_new_device: set address 2 failed - trying a port reset
 em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex
 usb_new_device: set address 2 failed
 uhub_explore: usb_new_device failed, error=SET_ADDR_FAILED
 uhub1: device problem (SET_ADDR_FAILED), disabling port 1
 em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex

i'll disconnect the usb stuff now ...

danny