From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Apr 26 4:14:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CED37B896 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 04:14:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA10092 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 13:14:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id NAA03534 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 13:14:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailgate.originative.co.uk (mailgate.originative.co.uk [194.217.50.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4717137B90E; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 04:13:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paul@originative.co.uk) Received: from originative.co.uk (lobster.originative.co.uk [194.217.50.241]) by mailgate.originative.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B09C1D15F; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 12:13:56 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <3906CF74.1AEBFD09@originative.co.uk> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 12:13:56 +0100 From: "Paul Richards.width" Organization: Originative Solutions Ltd X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en-GB, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Lehey Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Chuck Robey , Robert Watson , FreeBSD Committers Subject: Re: How about building modules along with the kernel? (was: cvs commit: src/sys/modules/syscons/fire fire_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/rain rain_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/warp warp_saver.c) References: <20000426124729.D40207@freebie.lemis.com> <20000425234016.D1022@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000426164824.D43932@freebie.lemis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greg Lehey wrote: > > On Tuesday, 25 April 2000 at 23:40:16 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 11:48:27PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: > >> Tell you what. Let the discussion carry on. If there's no movement by > >> Friday, I'll stick the offer back up. I just want to insure that it > >> doesn't die (again) by being stuck onto a proposal for too grand a design. > > > > The discussion should be moved to freebsd-arch then. > > > > FOLLOWS UP DIRECTED THERE. PLEASE *REMOVE* cvs-all & cvs-committers from > > this thread. > > In theory, that's all well and good. But look what wc -l tells me: > > 679 cvs-all > 1739 freebsd-current > 481 freebsd-arch > > cvs-all doesn't appear to be a real mailing list, be we all know that > there are about 200 people there. That means nearly 900 people on the > (mutually exclusive) cvs lists, at least another 800 over in -current, > less than 500 in -arch. You can't force a committer to join -arch, > which is why I still prefer -committers. But the reason that not all committers join arch is because not all committers are "arch" hackers. The committers list includes ports people and docs people. The -arch list is the correct place for this discussion and the sort of people interested in it will be over there. There used to be (still is but everyone ignores it) a policy that discussions should not take place on any committers lists because they are for the notification of commits and nothing more. There are a myriad other lists for holding technical discussions. Paul. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message