From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec  9 17:08:42 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9F423B
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun,  9 Dec 2012 17:08:42 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2EC8FC12
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun,  9 Dec 2012 17:08:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
 (envelope-from <freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org>) id 1ThkMq-0001HL-O8
 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 18:08:44 +0100
Received: from 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75])
 by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
 id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 18:08:40 +0100
Received: from jb.1234abcd by 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1
 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 18:08:40 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
From: jb <jb.1234abcd@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas?
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 17:08:12 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <loom.20121209T175758-502@post.gmane.org>
References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net>
 <loom.20121209T170705-935@post.gmane.org>
 <CAFYkXj=K_Yd3N8_bg9DF-SobkMAz_8VhLDWaU2gX6sjDht8pRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
 rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121121 Firefox/10.0.11)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 17:08:42 -0000

CeDeROM <cederom <at> tlen.pl> writes:

> ... 
> Was also true for me to crash the 9.0 system with dependencies
> inconsistency after some time. But! Try 9.1-RC3 and use PORTINSTALL
> ...

The reason I abandoned 9.1-RC? was the security update statement that
"It is believed that the compromise may have occurred as early as the 19th
September 2012."
I looked at 9.1 release schedule and saw this:
Action   Expected         Actual
RC1      2012-07-20      2012-08-23
RC2      2012-09-07      2012-10-09
...
and decided to drop the ball, go back to 9.0 and bring myself up from there.
The result was as described.
jb