From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 27 12:02:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE27416A417; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:02:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from babkin@verizon.net) Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net (vms044pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A1D43D49; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:02:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from babkin@verizon.net) Received: from vms064.mailsrvcs.net ([192.168.1.1]) by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0J690085Y2RVL5P3@vms044.mailsrvcs.net>; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:02:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 198.190.8.100 ([198.190.8.100]) by vms064.mailsrvcs.net (Verizon Webmail) with HTTP; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:02:19 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:02:19 -0500 (CDT) From: Sergey Babkin X-Originating-IP: [198.190.8.100] To: danger@rulez.sk, Christian Brueffer Message-id: <12530240.6470551159358539962.JavaMail.root@vms064.mailsrvcs.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Daniel Gerzo , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Re: cvs commit: src/share/examples/mdoc example.4 X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: babkin@users.sf.net List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:02:28 -0000 >From: danger@rulez.sk >Quoting Christian Brueffer : > >> I don't agree to these changes, see below for details (also I don't see where >> exactly you removed second person usage, it's still being used in the new >> version). > >We want to aviod to use words like "you", "your" and so on. I have >talked about it with Ruslan and my mentors. Why? They make the text more readable. I'd say that The Bureaucratic Style Is Bad. -SB