Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 23:13:34 -0600 (CST) From: Anthony Kimball <alk@pobox.com> To: sprice@hiwaay.net Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: the prelease jdk1.2 for linux: problem Message-ID: <14063.14629.811288.172253@avalon.east> References: <19990317130039A.daichi@ongs.net> <Pine.OSF.4.02.9903162210520.6313-100000@fly.HiWAAY.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoth Steve Price on Tue, 16 March: : : No. '-Djava.comiler=tya' is a valid use if you have the TYA JIT. : A JIT is usually a .so file and is usually located in a directory : like '/usr/local/jdk1.2/lib/i386/green_threads/'. I had read in a Sun document, although it was a propos of JAVA_COMPILER envar settings rather than -Djava.compiler= property settings, that in the future only the value NONE would be honored (i.e. disabling JIT) and that the .so-file basename-suffix semantics of various 1.1.x JDKs would not hold in the future -- i.e. 1.2.x. Do you know otherwise? I mean, has your work with the JDK 1.2 code shown that the reference platform retains the 1.1.x semantics for JAVA_COMPILER and/or -Djava.compiler=, JavaSoft's protestations notwithstanding? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14063.14629.811288.172253>