From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 16 21:01:24 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA07441 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 16 May 1996 21:01:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA07434; Thu, 16 May 1996 21:01:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id UAA18769; Thu, 16 May 1996 20:58:30 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199605170358.UAA18769@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: A MMAP observation To: gpalmer@FreeBSD.org (Gary Palmer) Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 20:58:30 -0700 (MST) Cc: mrcpu@cdsnet.net, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <9269.832294686@palmer.demon.co.uk> from "Gary Palmer" at May 17, 96 01:58:06 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Of course, if somebody would make ODBC clients for FreeBSD so I could let > > it talk to my NT SQL server, then I wouldn't have to mess with this at > > all. :) > > I think ``ODBC'' is another mis-nomer from the halls of Microsoft. I > don't know anything ``open'' about it. I've certainly never seen any > published (and freely available) specs for it (Of course, I will no > doubt be corrected by Terry if I'm wrong :-) ). I'm willing to bet > that you have to pay Microsoft to get the interface specs. I saw a posting of a UNIX ODBC on comp.sources.unix about 8 months ago (+/- 2 months). I didn't grab it because I found the idea singularly uninteresting compared to SQL. I thought it was server-only code. It might have been client-only code. Like I said -- uninteresting. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.