Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 17:32:49 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: config.guess (was: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/libmikmod/files patch-config.sub) Message-ID: <20030707003249.GA21397@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <7mwuev9ocj.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> References: <200306190941.h5J9fIYL073911@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030620165635.GA53379@rot13.obsecurity.org> <bd076g$1nul$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> <7misqx7ftv.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> <bdajjd$2gjo$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> <7mwuev9ocj.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 09:23:24AM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > At Tue, 24 Jun 2003 23:30:42 +0000 (UTC), > Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > > I'm not sure whether we should import GNU stuff in ports tree or not. > > > I'm building amd64 packages with my local $CONFIG_SUB_OVERRIDE patch. > > > This is inspired from NetBSD's $CONFIG_SUB_OVERRIDE. [...] > >=20 > > Well, this is very similar to the CONFIG_GUESS_DIRS approach I > > copied from OpenBSD. From the porter's perspective, the only > > difference is the name of the variable. > >=20 > > > As we provide correct (hopefully :-)) $CPU-$VENDOR-$OS string in ports > > > infrastracture, I'm using extremely simplified config.sub script. > >=20 > > Yes, it may very well be possible to replace config.guess/config.sub > > by extremely simplified scriptlets. >=20 > I don't care what variable name is used. :-) > Only I worry is whether we should import GPL'ed stuff in ports tree. Since we're not adding any new dependencies on GPL code, I don't think it's an issue. > > But none of these are due to config.* problems, are they? >=20 > Yes, there are many ports which should be patched for amd64 other than > config.* stuff. FYI, an amd64 build is currently in progress on bento: http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-5-failure.html http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-5-latest/ It's proceeding remarkably well so far, although there are a lot of failures from ports requiring -fPIC. Kris --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/CL+xWry0BWjoQKURAgBIAJ9uxuxFS8z0r1NmwQO8AixnIITWtACdHaqV h1OlXHuGfpBTBE/q2KHN8Cc= =j3xz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030707003249.GA21397>