Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 09:42:02 -0600 From: Ted Spradley <tsprad@set.spradley.tmi.net> To: "David C. Jenner" <djenner@halcyon.com> Cc: Keith Woodman <keith@lightningweb.com>, Jacques Vidrine <n@nectar.com>, chris@tci.com, mmercer@ipass.net, jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, me@T-F-I.freeserve.co.uk, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Confusion Message-ID: <199903191542.JAA03939@set.spradley.tmi.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 19 Mar 1999 07:06:26 PST." <36F267F2.627CC555@halcyon.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Will you people please quit whining about the names and tell us what your real complaints are? What exactly is it about 3.0 release that doesn't work as well as it should? I've used every Walnut Creek FreeBSD CDROM since 2.0 Release, including all the 3.0-current snapshots, and I've used -current sampled at just random times at my convenience. I admit I don't beat it up very hard, but without exception, *every* version of FreeBSD that I have tried has been noticeably better than *any* version of any other brand of any system I've ever tried in over 30 years of computing. So just what is it that doesn't work right for you? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903191542.JAA03939>