From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 24 20:29:49 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F7C16A401
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:29:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu)
Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu
	[140.142.32.134])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E999343D48
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:29:48 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu)
Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139])
	by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.6+UW06.03/8.13.5+UW06.03) with ESMTP
	id k3OKTmTl015401
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:29:48 -0700
X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.4.96] (dzihan.cs.washington.edu [128.208.4.96])
	(authenticated authid=youshi10)
	by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.6+UW06.03/8.13.6+UW06.03) with ESMTP id
	k3OKThVq001096
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:29:48 -0700
Message-ID: <444D3537.3060006@u.washington.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:29:43 -0700
From: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8-1.1.1.1vy+fc4 (X11/20060419)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <200604242043.25020.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au>	<200604242046.42039.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au>	<4166.194.201.68.18.1145879418.squirrel@www.firebadger.net>
	<200604242050.57732.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
In-Reply-To: <200604242050.57732.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0,
	__CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0,
	__MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0'
Subject: Re: A portupgrade question
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:29:49 -0000

RW wrote:

>On Monday 24 April 2006 12:50, Richard Collyer wrote:
>  
>
>>On Mon, April 24, 2006 12:16 pm, Ian Moore wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>On Monday 24 April 2006 20:43, Ian Moore wrote:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened
>>>>with it a couple of times now. The last 2 times libgda has been
>>>>upgraded,
>>>>I've run portupgrade -a to upgrade a bunch of ports, including libgda.
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>I always use portupgrade -aR to make sure dependencies are done. However
>>with mysql I find that portupgrade is not the best.
>>
>>    
>>
>
> -a,   -ra,     -Ra and -RrA  all do *exactly*  the same thing
>  
>
Not true. -a is for all, -r is recursive, -R is upper recursive, and -A 
is not even valid given the syntax above...
All I can say is, "RTFM": portupgrade(1).

-Garrett