Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:29:43 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A portupgrade question Message-ID: <444D3537.3060006@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <200604242050.57732.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> References: <200604242043.25020.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> <200604242046.42039.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> <4166.194.201.68.18.1145879418.squirrel@www.firebadger.net> <200604242050.57732.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
RW wrote: >On Monday 24 April 2006 12:50, Richard Collyer wrote: > > >>On Mon, April 24, 2006 12:16 pm, Ian Moore wrote: >> >> >>>On Monday 24 April 2006 20:43, Ian Moore wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened >>>>with it a couple of times now. The last 2 times libgda has been >>>>upgraded, >>>>I've run portupgrade -a to upgrade a bunch of ports, including libgda. >>>> >>>> <snip> >>>> >>>> >>I always use portupgrade -aR to make sure dependencies are done. However >>with mysql I find that portupgrade is not the best. >> >> >> > > -a, -ra, -Ra and -RrA all do *exactly* the same thing > > Not true. -a is for all, -r is recursive, -R is upper recursive, and -A is not even valid given the syntax above... All I can say is, "RTFM": portupgrade(1). -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?444D3537.3060006>