Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 22:28:30 +0800 From: Dinesh Nair <dinesh@alphaque.com> To: "Andrew P." <infofarmer@gmail.com> Cc: Olaf Greve <o.greve@axis.nl>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which MySQL version best to use and with/without linux threads? Message-ID: <4341400E.5040706@alphaque.com> In-Reply-To: <cb5206420509300908t51b49b1ds777d89af75de139f@mail.gmail.com> References: <ED4C536E-48C1-11D9-B2C4-000A2791B6EC@illusionart.com> <1102494183.41b6b9e726b2f@www.domainfactory-webmail.de> <433D3C12.6020104@axis.nl> <cb5206420509300908t51b49b1ds777d89af75de139f@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/01/05 00:08 Andrew P. said the following: > linuxthreads were only important on FreeBSD 4.x. > Starting with 5.x we have a more efficient threading > model. Extensive testing did not reveal any significant is this definitive, i.e. that on 5.x linuxthreads are worse off than native freebsd threads ? i'm not trying to be a troll, but over on the asterisk mailing lists, we're in the midst of discussing if /usr/ports/net/asterisk should be using linuxthreads or pthreads by default. on 4.x (which i'm still on), linuxthreads has oodles better performance than native pthreads, but i havent really done any testing on 5.x or 6.x. any advice here would be much appreciated. -- Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4341400E.5040706>