From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Oct 16 17:06:36 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E39A16A41F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 17:06:36 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org)
Received: from mail.ecolines.ru (ns.ecolines.ru [81.3.181.213])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322E543D48
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 17:06:34 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org)
Received: (qmail 5804 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2005 17:09:06 -0000
Received: from dialup84107-101.ip.peterstar.net (HELO doom.homeunix.org)
	(ip@84.204.107.101)
	by mail.ecolines.ru with ESMTPA; 16 Oct 2005 17:09:06 -0000
Received: from doom.homeunix.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by doom.homeunix.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9GH5Apw000950;
	Sun, 16 Oct 2005 21:05:18 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org)
Received: (from igor@localhost)
	by doom.homeunix.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j9GH52uU000949;
	Sun, 16 Oct 2005 21:05:02 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from igor)
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 21:04:58 +0400
From: Igor Pokrovsky <ip@doom.homeunix.org>
To: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20051016170458.GA926@doom.homeunix.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org>,
	freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net>
References: <82117273F2B3D8076639D8D3@palle.girgensohn.se>
	<200510142149.54931.lofi@freebsd.org>
	<20051016070643.GA379@doom.homeunix.org>
	<200510161835.54216.lofi@freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200510161835.54216.lofi@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net>
Subject: Re: linking problems with heimdal in base (ports version works)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 17:06:36 -0000

On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 06:35:51PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Sunday, 16. October 2005 09:06, Igor Pokrovsky wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 09:49:51PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > > On Friday, 14. October 2005 21:11, Igor Pokrovsky wrote:
> > > > > Still, isn't it strange that the kerberos libs don't have any
> > > > > dependencies registered? A quick check shows that they are almost the
> > > > > only libs in /usr/lib that have zero output from ldd.
> > > >
> > > > Probably they are statically linked.
> > >
> > > No, static libraries don't come with an .so extension. :-)
> >
> > No, you missed my point. I mean that kerberos libs are dynamic but
> > linked against other libraries statically.
> 
> If they were, there would be no problem in the first place.

Sorry, it seems I missed a part of the thread.

-ip

-- 
The love letter you finally got the courage to send
will be delayed in the mail long enough for you to
make a fool of yourself in person.