From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 2 21:41:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1697816A4D0 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 21:41:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C69943D53 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 21:41:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a36so849668rnf for ; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 13:41:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=EEDUKAdGBwIf8pDHSHqmPI1HVxeVCy7b5QuDW7HNQSE8aSmrupYXrr+Yzl47F9ARfG4UMHRRPbrakW61j5ku/b06678pgAwTm4880LJKjR1sXoc0O+w2iwISmoHEc7TuydkSPRn2Zmxsu4ybr0RNLy2tu+00lDhJVsQRM0WUgkk= Received: by 10.38.15.61 with SMTP id 61mr1040214rno; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 13:41:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.15.38 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:41:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 21:41:35 +0000 From: Eric Kjeldergaard To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= In-Reply-To: <41AF8A18.8090303@club-internet.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <41AE3F80.1000506@freebsd.org> <41AF8A18.8090303@club-internet.fr> cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: Scott Long cc: "current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: My project wish-list for the next 12 months X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eric Kjeldergaard List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 21:41:37 -0000 > >> 4. Journaled filesystem. > > > > The stage of the current implementation is, as I said, read-only. > > Further, it's currently i386 only. > > In theory, it shouldn't be tied to i386, but I never tested it somewhere > else unfortunately. > Got that from the reiserfs port which says it doesn't compile other than under i386. > > However, I think that there is enough interest in this new (and > > relatively exciting) filesystem that we may be able to find some > > developers with time (Possibly including myself) and desire to try to > > implement write support and do some porting. To ease any qualms > > with regards to licensing, it appears > > (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-October/040998.html) > > that the current implementation is BSD licensed. > > Not exactly. Only the mount_reiserfs command is under BSD. The kernel > module is GPL. > Oh, I'm sorry. I guess I read quickly and w/o thinking enough. I suppose that would put is near square 1. > I don't know neither JFS nor XFS, but Reiser4 may be a great candidate > too (the current port is ReiserFS 3.6 only). It sure doesn't have the > maturity of ReiserFS but brings nice features. That would be nice if the support could be gathered for it. I do like it better than XFS (which I've tried). -- If I write a signature, my emails will appear more personalised.