From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 20 14:50:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 920E81065745; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:50:09 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Ryan Steinmetz Message-ID: <20120220145009.GA74216@FreeBSD.org> References: <201202201423.q1KEN6hr009880@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201202201423.q1KEN6hr009880@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net-mgmt/net-snmp Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:50:09 -0000 On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 02:23:06PM +0000, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: > zi 2012-02-20 14:23:06 UTC > > Modified files: > net-mgmt/net-snmp Makefile > Log: > - Forced commit to note the bump in PORTREVISION I think this kind of commits are gratuitous and should not be forced, as they bring little good (obvious "what" vs. "why" rule for commit messages) and merely cause unnecessary repo churn. ./danfe