Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:12:33 -0800 From: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't compile jdk15 on amd64 5.3-STABLE Message-ID: <1108714353.99230.3.camel@server.mcneil.com> In-Reply-To: <20050218080404.GA76967@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200502131433.43567.nb_root@videotron.ca> <20050214003007.GE68054@dragon.nuxi.com> <200502131935.57231.nb_root@videotron.ca> <20050218080404.GA76967@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 00:04 -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 07:35:56PM -0500, Nicolas Blais wrote: > > Actually, I can build jdk15 on a amd64 6-CURRENT machine and I can't on a > > amd64 5.3-STABLE. Yes I believe (as well as others) that it is due to a > > maximum command line size (as mentioned, the javac command during that point > > in the makefile is about 25000 char long and on my -STABLE I can only get > > 16384) > > I don't know why so many think that 6-CURRENT has a greater maximum > command line size than 5-STABLE. Anyway, I just committed a change to > 6-STABLE to increase it (based on a thread in freebsd-current@ from back > in Sept. 2004). I'll MFC it for 5-STABLE. > > If there is some other sizing difference, then those affected need to > track it down and point out what it is so we can deal with it. The problem is that a Linux emulated program (linux-sun-jdk) would die with something like bad address printed to the stderr/stdout. It isn't the command line size alone (I don't think). Once I got past that initial failure, I am able to rebuilt jdk15 natively without any issues. So I'd say there is a problem with the linux32 emulation. Cheers, Sean
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1108714353.99230.3.camel>