From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Sep 12 11:23:17 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA20752
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 12 Sep 1996 11:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA20745
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 1996 11:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA04279; Thu, 12 Sep 1996 11:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: graphix@iastate.edu, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: OpenBSD <-> FreeBSD 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Sep 1996 11:16:59 PDT."
             <199609121816.LAA07211@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 11:21:46 -0700
Message-ID: <4277.842552506@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Just a note: OpenBSD is not the only source of fixes being discarded.
> Hint: have you integrated the patches I sent you to add remote system
> semantics for flock for support of NFS server locking yet?

No, because I don't know enough about the VFS system to even verify
that they work properly.  I'd be a lot happier if someone with half a
clue about NFS, like Doug, did the integration.

					Jordan