From owner-freebsd-current Mon May 13 02:29:29 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id CAA06495 for current-outgoing; Mon, 13 May 1996 02:29:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA06485 for ; Mon, 13 May 1996 02:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.5/8.6.9) id CAA04334; Mon, 13 May 1996 02:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 02:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199605130929.CAA04334@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: jmacd@CS.Berkeley.EDU CC: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199605130720.AAA19708@paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU> (message from Josh MacDonald on Mon, 13 May 1996 00:20:10 -0700) Subject: Re: version of makeinfo in -current From: asami@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * Would anyone object to upgrading the version of makeinfo in the * current source tree? It is quite old. Its behaviour is totally * different from the newer version when certain options are specified, * and it has bugs. * * I can perform this upgrade. I certainly won't object (in fact I will encourage you to do such tasks), as long as you check and see if anything in the main source tree calls it with the incompatible options. * This seems to be a recurring thing for me to mail the lists, I'm * using FreeBSD as a development machine, and every piece of GNU software * I use I have to install from the current release, its kind of annoying. You know, I tend to think that if you send us bmaked diffs for half the things that you complain about, the world will be a much warmer and fuzzier place for all FreeBSD'ers. :) Satoshi "where is the gcc-2.7.2 upgrade? :)" Asami