From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 31 22:43:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7222537BFA7 for ; Wed, 31 May 2000 22:43:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA48880; Wed, 31 May 2000 23:43:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id XAA27228; Wed, 31 May 2000 23:43:26 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200006010543.XAA27228@harmony.village.org> To: "Bharat Mediratta" Subject: Re: GENERIC 4.0 kernel compile fails on in_cksum.c Cc: "Erik Trulsson" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 31 May 2000 22:09:10 PDT." References: Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 23:43:26 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message "Bharat Mediratta" writes: : I took Kris Kenneway's advice and switched to 4.0-RELEASE. The : quotes that I gave you are, in fact, from the 4.0-RELEASE : /usr/src/UPDATING file. I'm now somewhat committed to upgrading : once to 4.0-RELEASE and then from there to 4.0-STABLE. Yes. Sadly, we found out after the 4.0-RELEASE went out that they were inaccurate. Since you sent to 4.0-RELEASE first, I'll bet it was smooth sailing to -STABLE from there. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message