From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 23 08:30:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF371065687 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:30:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9DF8FC28 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0N8UB3D030750 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:30:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q0N8UBX9030744; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:30:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:30:11 GMT Message-Id: <201201230830.q0N8UBX9030744@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org From: "Eugene M. Zheganin" Cc: Subject: Re: kern/164400: immediate crash after the start of ipsec processing X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Eugene M. Zheganin" List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:30:15 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/164400; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Eugene M. Zheganin" To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, eugene@zhegan.in Cc: Subject: Re: kern/164400: immediate crash after the start of ipsec processing Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:22:59 +0600 I've re-read it and I found one phrase that can cause misunderstanding: 'Without it it runs fine.' I should write 'without switching to master and starting ipsec processing from branches'.