From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 16 02:32:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513591065670; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:32:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f177.google.com (mail-iw0-f177.google.com [209.85.223.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036168FC27; Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:32:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn7 with SMTP id 7so977272iwn.7 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:32:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:user-agent:x-openpgp-key-id :x-openpgp-key-fingerprint:mime-version:content-type; bh=OUIR1cCCQlRbSj8f2J6m6noeRMO076U+azjF8UR88p4=; b=VOdnh4mZ1z9ze9wsf+SiO7jayb0NFiUoP8TlORyO6hpOfIvNJ+agP87W6s9tk+y/kj yjFnOc37jLspE/5JbiUsk4Mc1Bsj1hBuZFokV8js00uyxQpZ3Dch0dQ3XMBYV+zMkibA s2l4tB4DGZ9Z1QdioIMkUJgVniUEw6ugJ89R4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:user-agent :x-openpgp-key-id:x-openpgp-key-fingerprint:mime-version :content-type; b=VeNMo3eSADCnjIwWMkVIaRukfOp2Wi1BuvQI+G4tXTIHWJhfl445uH2St61lVoW2L8 40QwnrPlIpm6kNWsyObwndZ22ceyTmnrH5zS59ZVDBO3BZFFGak9teC2tnrQAngKpToX +kWMmWpSqypkB9WaHaXoHEuFH6+JjZ5y2ncT4= Received: by 10.231.146.211 with SMTP id i19mr1843422ibv.22.1263609171553; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:32:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from centel.dataix.local (ppp-23.191.dialinfree.com [209.172.23.191]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm1906360iwn.10.2010.01.15.18.32.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:32:50 -0800 (PST) Sender: "J. Hellenthal" Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:32:32 -0500 From: jhell To: FreeBSD Ports Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-OpenPGP-Key-Id: 0x89D8547E X-OpenPGP-Key-Fingerprint: 85EF E26B 07BB 3777 76BE B12A 9057 8789 89D8 547E MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: dougb@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports-mgmt/portmaster distfile expression matching X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 02:32:56 -0000 Hi Doug, Recently in upgrading x11-wm/xmonad and x11-wm/xmonad-contrib I had noticed that when portmaster asks to delete a distfile, when it asks about xmonad-0.9.1 it was also asking to delete the xmonad-contrib-0.9.1 before it had even upgraded xmonad-contrib. Is this a problem on portmasters behalf or is this on ports structure side ?. What do you or anyone else think about each port possibly keeping obsolete-distfiles list one much like distinfo but a concatenated list of previous distinfo's that had once been used allowing a ( make distclean ) or something routine to be built into the ports infrastructure to parse that file in each port ? -- jhell