From nobody Sun May 23 19:53:23 2021 X-Original-To: desktop@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8424E9F314D for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 19:53:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (vogon.madpilot.net [159.69.1.99]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fp9y05590z4l7D for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 19:53:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Fp9xy6zx6z6dnW for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 21:53:26 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=madpilot.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-language:content-type :content-type:date:date:message-id:subject:subject:from:from :received; s=bjowvop61wgh; t=1621799604; x=1623614005; bh=D/U7D+ chtpQ4/f2pCM89AqsxcHrRDV0HY5+l56fCW7c=; b=t/WoqpxrQwhz7n8xQnQHGt 5D2zJQb66NezxqabHGTp7x1EULg69Ok2lmLFXtopje3nPG7gtvmuJ0jAJZmtOH0g oCmxKukpKR4z5joR8nfVtZWKCGFBFwcZT2/zDPpVmMFAZ2l46+J8lIX84Wcr4KdN CHcnTXq93PoeWRfcy7cMaMrbapKtx83TJgyCjFW4WDsJzSn0gM6LXEFD90Oh3dym PHTODqqzka2uKtHbV+x1gzU9B0BYNA7crxWABQ1R8LP7vbFQmlQM3RkX0qNvlzgW FibN75SYO6seih6Gc///VDCn7njpGZgkHNOCDJO5j+SvI8n32mSjCKHYaO1vgqLQ == Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id JGnZQf-fX_RH for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 21:53:24 +0200 (CEST) To: desktop@FreeBSD.org Subject: lightdm maintainership Message-ID: <47b358f9-7d1e-87fa-b64f-ed307af3744d@madpilot.net> Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 21:53:23 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fp9y05590z4l7D X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=madpilot.net header.s=bjowvop61wgh header.b=t/Woqpxr; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=madpilot.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mad@madpilot.net designates 159.69.1.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mad@madpilot.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[159.69.1.99:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[madpilot.net:s=bjowvop61wgh]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[desktop@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[159.69.1.99:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[madpilot.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[madpilot.net,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:159.69.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[desktop] Reply-To: mad@madpilot.net From: Guido Falsi via desktop X-Original-From: Guido Falsi List-Id: Using and improving FreeBSD on the desktop List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-desktop List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-desktop@freebsd.org Hi all! Recently maintainership for lightdm ports has been put back to the pool for personal reasons. I am keeping the xfce ports updated it is an optional dependency of the xfce port and a common choice for a display manager. In fact it is what I usually suggest if asked about it. I have been thinking of taking maintainership as myself or as xfce@ for x11/lightdm and x11/lightdm-gtk-greeter since I use them and they are a common choice for xfce and I use them. Before doing this I thought, since I bet they are a common choice for other desktop environment users as well, if it would be more appropriate to assign them to desktop@. Any thought on this? Also I can't remember rules for implicit approval to desktop@maintainer ports. Are people from kde@ xfce@ gnome@ (etc.) automatically included? -- Guido Falsi