From owner-freebsd-current Fri Sep 24 0:39:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from gratis.grondar.za (gratis.grondar.za [196.7.18.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BCE15554 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 00:39:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA90307; Fri, 24 Sep 1999 09:38:24 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <199909240738.JAA90307@gratis.grondar.za> To: Joe Abley Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 09:38:23 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > How much mail does the use of the MAPS DUL reject? Virtually none. The idea is that dial-up users use their own ISP's smarthosts, in which case the ISP can nail them if they are spammers, and I don't get their spam if they go for the "direct-to-MX" or "direct injection" spamming method. Some mail may get temporarily blocked until the sender added his IPS's smathost to his mailing configs. > How much of that do you think is worth rejecting? I wish to reject no legitimate mail. I would fight use of the DUL _hard_ if there was no (smarthost) alternative. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message